Legislation
stops development of the Pentagon’s new $93-96 billion intercontinental
ballistic missile and redirects savings this fiscal year towards development of
a universal coronavirus vaccine
Washington (March 26, 2021) - Today, Senators Edward J.
Markey (D-Mass.), Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East
Asia, and Representative Ro Khanna (CA-17), Member of the House Armed Services
Committee, introduced the
Investing in Cures Before Missiles (ICBM) Act.
The
ICBM Act would stop the further development of the Pentagon’s new
$93-96 billion ground-based strategic deterrent (GBSD) intercontinental
ballistic missile (ICBM) and direct those savings towards development of a
universal coronavirus vaccine, as Senator Markey
called for in February, and towards the battle against other types of biothreats.
“The United States should invest in a vaccine of mass
prevention before another new land-based weapon of mass destruction,” said
Chairman Markey. “The ICBM Act makes clear that we can begin to
phase out the Cold War nuclear posture that risks accidental nuclear war while
still deterring adversaries and assuring allies, and redirect those savings to
the clear and present dangers posed by coronaviruses and other emerging and
infectious diseases. The devastation sown by COVID-19 would pale in comparison
to that of even a limited nuclear war. The ICBM Act signals that we
intend to make the world safe from nuclear weapons and prioritize spending that
saves lives, rather than ends them.”
“With all of the global challenges we face, the
last thing we should be doing is giving billions to defense contractors to
build missiles we don’t need to keep as a strong nuclear deterrence,” said
Representative Ro Khanna. “Proud to introduce this important legislation
with Senator Markey in a bicameral effort to bring back some semblance of
rationality into our defense spending and common sense in our nuclear
modernization policy. The GBSD program is unneeded and projected to cost $100
billion, there is simply no logical reason to allow the program to move
forward. For much cheaper, we can extend the lifespan of the Minuteman III
missiles we already have and instead focus on investing in the urgent national
security threat in front of us: the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Specifically the ICBM Act would:
- Life-extend the current Minuteman III ICBM and redirect
$1 billion of the unobligated balances to the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases to conduct or support research for the
development of a universal coronavirus vaccine;
- Transfer unobligated funds for the National Nuclear
Security Administration’s W87-1 warhead modification program to the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to research and combat emerging
and zoonotic infectious diseases;
- Prohibit funds authorized for fiscal year 2022 from
being obligated or expended for the GBSD program or the W87-1 warhead
modification program; and
- Commission an independent study by the National Academy
of Sciences to explore viable technical solutions to extend the Minuteman
III intercontinental ballistic missile to 2050, to include force structure
changes and the non-destructive testing of missiles.
The
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) has continually cited
affordability concerns related to the estimated $1.7 trillion dollars – which
includes the GBSD, associated warhead, and plutonium pit production
requirements – that is planned through fiscal year 2046 to upgrade the U.S.
nuclear weapons enterprise. The
ICBM Act demonstrates that the United
States can maintain a safe, secure, effective and affordable nuclear arsenal
that deters adversaries and reassures allies without making a
multi-generational estimated
$260 billion life-cycle investment in the GBSD. An
October 2020 public opinion poll showed that only 26 percent of registered voters preferred
replacing the Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile with GBSD, as
compared to 60 percent of registered voters who opposed replacing the Minuteman
III missile.
A copy of the legislation can be found
HERE and a
one-pager can be found
HERE.
Co-sponsoring the ICBM Act in the Senate are
Senators Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), and Jeff Merkley
(D-Ore.).
Co-Sponsoring the ICBM Act in the House are
Representatives Earl Blumenauer (OR-03), Steve Cohen (TN-09), Jesus García (IL-04), Raúl M.
Grijalva (AZ-03), Jared Huffman (CA-02), Sheila Jackson Lee
(TX-18), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Barbara Lee (CA-13), Jim McGovern (MA-02),
Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC), Ilhan Omar (MN-05), Mark Pocan (WI-02), and Ayanna
Pressley (MA-07).
The legislation is also supported by several peace and
security organizations:
“Whatever you think ails this nation, a new generation of
nuclear missiles is not the answer. The good news is that the country can save
money and become more secure at the same time. Congress can and should redirect
this nuclear funding to address more pressing needs like the pandemic. Thank
you Sen. Markey and Rep. Khanna for your leadership on this issue” – Bill
Perry, former Secretary of Defense
“When more Americans have died from the coronavirus than in
combat in World War II, it is time for the United States to rethink its
national security priorities. No American will be safer from the real threats
they face today by rushing another costly and unnecessary nuclear weapons
system into production, when those same tax dollars might save lives if put
toward more pressing issues of national health, infrastructure and economic
relief. Instead of building more weapons to fight a Cold War strategy, let’s
invest in meeting the challenges of today and tomorrow. We thank Senator Markey
and Representative Khanna for their consistent leadership on this issue.” - Former
Congressman John Tierney, Executive Director, Council for a Livable World
“It is time to put masks and vaccines before new nuclear
missiles. We shouldn’t spend our limited resources on nuclear weapons that we
don’t need and that make us less safe. Instead we must redirect tax dollars to
helping families and fighting the pandemic. I congratulate Sen. Markey and Rep.
Khanna for their crucial work” – Tom Collina, Policy Director, Ploughshares
Fund
“Not only does the United States not need ICBMs to keep us
protected, their current ‘prompt launch’ posture makes nuclear war more likely
due to the risk of mistaken or accidental launch. In that light, the United
States should not spend $264 billion to build and deploy hundreds of land-based
missiles, but devote those resources to higher priorities like ending the
pandemic, addressing the climate crisis, and building racial equity. This bill
begins that vital process” – Stephen Young, Acting Co-Director, Global
Security Program, Union of Concerned Scientists.
"ICBMs are the least valuable and least stabilizing
leg of the U.S. nuclear triad. Spending approximately $100 billion to buy a new
ICBM system and billions more on an upgraded ICBM warhead is unnecessary and
would divert funds from higher priority national security needs, including
pandemic defense and response. There are cheaper options to maintain a credible
ICBM force than moving full steam ahead with the GBSD and W87-1 programs and
pursuing them would be consistent with the Biden administration's desire to
seek further negotiated arms control arrangements with Russia. We applaud
Senator Markey and Rep. Khanna for their vital leadership on this issue” – Kingston
Reif, Director of Disarmament and Threat Reduction, Arms Control Association.
"Physicians for Social Responsibility welcomes this
sensible legislation from Senator Markey and Representative Khanna. It is
clear that pandemic preparedness and public health infrastructure are much
better investments than new nuclear weapons we don't need and that don't make
us safe” – Jeff Carter, Executive Director, Physicians for Social
Responsibility
“American voters want vaccines instead of unneeded nuclear
missiles that can end humanity,” said Paul Kawika Martin, the Senior
Director for Policy and Political Affairs with Peace Action. “Once
again, Sen. Ed Markey and Rep. Ro Khanna lead the way with pragmatic
legislation that will fund pandemic solutions over nuclear silos that cost as
much as two Departments of State. With the Treaty to Ban Nuclear Weapons now in
force, the U.S. should move towards eliminating these horrific weapons.”
“The United States is at a crossroads with a new
president and a new congress. We must ask ourselves if we want to keep
investing in the failed status quo violence-first mentality or in things that
actually keep people safe. A new land-based nuclear weapon to the tune of $264
billion is everything that is wrong with the status quo. I applaud Sen. Markey
and Rep. Khanna for sponsoring the ICBM Act, a bill that will help the U.S.
respond to the true drivers of insecurity and reimagine federal budget
priorities” – Erica Fein, Advocacy Director, Win Without War.
“The United States nuclear arsenal far exceeds any
plausible mission requirements put forth by the Pentagon. Even in the best of
times, $264 billion for new nuclear missiles is money we can’t spare for
weapons we don’t need. In the middle of a devastating pandemic, it’s
irresponsible. Senator Markey and Representative Khanna understand taxpayer
dollars should fund programs that address real threats to Americans, like the
pandemic, instead of wasteful nuclear missile programs” – Jessica Sleight,
Program Director, Global Zero
“ICBMs are dangerous, unnecessary, and enormously
expensive. There is no strategic need to build a new one – and certainly
not at a staggering lifetime cost of $264 billion. At a time when hundreds of
thousands of Americans have died from a pandemic whose effects could have been
dramatically reduced by adequate investments in public health and medical
research, this bill sets the right priorities by shifting funds towards
addressing the most urgent threats we face, rather than squandering them on a
system that puts us all at risk by making an accidental nuclear war more
likely. Sen. Markey and Rep. Khanna are to be commended for introducing this
timely and urgently needed legislation” – William D. Hartung Director, Arms
and Security Program Center for International Policy